Moving a single point load along a simply-supported beam and watching the support reactions redistribute in real time — the direct visual meaning behind ΣF = 0 and ΣM = 0.
A free-body diagram isolates a single object (a beam, a bracket, a truss member) and shows every force and moment acting on it — applied loads, support reactions, and internal forces — as arrows, without showing the surrounding structure that produces those forces. It's the starting point of virtually every statics problem: get the free-body diagram right, and applying the equilibrium equations (ΣF = 0, ΣM = 0) becomes mechanical; get it wrong, and no amount of correct algebra afterward fixes a missing or misdirected force.
The whole point of a free-body diagram is replacing everything the body is connected to (supports, other members, the ground) with the forces those connections actually exert — a pin support gets replaced by two reaction force components (or one force at an unknown angle), a roller support gets replaced by a single reaction force perpendicular to the rolling surface, and so on. This lets you analyze the isolated body using only forces, without needing to model the entire surrounding structure at once.
A rigid body in static equilibrium must satisfy ΣF = 0 (the vector sum of all forces is zero — no net force) and ΣM = 0 (the sum of all moments about any point is zero — no net rotation tendency). In two dimensions, this gives three independent scalar equations (ΣFx = 0, ΣFy = 0, ΣM = 0), which is why a simply-supported beam with a pin and a roller — three unknown reaction components total — is exactly solvable: three equations, three unknowns.
Taking moments about support A eliminates Rₐ from that equation (since it has no moment arm about its own location), leaving R_B directly solvable from the load's position and magnitude alone — R_B = (load × distance from A) ÷ span. As the load moves closer to B, its moment arm about A grows, requiring R_B to grow to balance it; Rₐ then follows from ΣF = 0. This is exactly the relationship the interactive diagram shows: move the load, and the reactions redistribute according to this same moment-balance logic.
A pin support can resist force in any direction (it's free to rotate but not translate), so it's replaced by two unknown reaction force components (typically horizontal and vertical) in a free-body diagram. A roller support can only resist force perpendicular to the surface it rolls on — it's free to move along that surface — so it contributes only one unknown reaction force, in that perpendicular direction.
That's called static indeterminacy — more unknown reactions than available independent equilibrium equations. It can't be solved with statics alone; it requires additional equations from the structure's deformation behavior (compatibility equations), which is the domain of structural analysis and strength of materials, not statics alone.
Taking moments about a support is a common and efficient choice because it eliminates that support's own reaction force from the equation (since it has zero moment arm about its own point of application), directly solving for the other support's reaction. You can technically take moments about any point and still get a valid equation, but choosing a support point is usually the fastest path to an answer.
Try our STEM Learning Studio
More calculators, simulators, and guides for this discipline.