Seasonal cooling
Btu removed per Wh over a defined cooling season. It does not determine heating COP.
Find dependable inputs. Keep the operating conditions attached.
Explore sources for SEER2, COP17 and COP47, identify matched heat-pump systems and evaluate performance at defined operating conditions.
Source directory and equipment file review
Equipment records and performance summaries: to be provided. Sources reviewed: .
Btu removed per Wh over a defined cooling season. It does not determine heating COP.
Dimensionless heat output / electrical input at a stated operating point. Rated and maximum output differ.
The same ratio at a different outdoor temperature. Match indoor conditions and power boundaries too.
There is no universal mathematical conversion from SEER2 to COP17 or COP47. Dividing a seasonal efficiency by 3.412 changes its units; it does not produce a heating COP at a particular temperature. Seasonal cooling efficiency and heating performance at a specific temperature must be evaluated separately.
For a single documented heating point, COP = heating capacity (Btu/h) ÷ 3,412.142 ÷ electrical input (kW). Both inputs must describe the same conditions and power boundary. A ratio calculated from reported values must be labeled as derived; it is not automatically a certified rating.
ENERGY STAR metric definitions and test-condition notes ↗Use the source descriptions to assess data coverage, access options and reuse requirements.
The reporting specification covers heating capacity, electrical input and COP at 17°F and 47°F, with separate minimum, rated and maximum operating points. Check each equipment record for the values reported.
Use the exact matched indoor/outdoor combination and AHRI reference to check certified ratings. Do not assume every extended operating point is a certified field.
Request extended heating tables for exact matched systems: capacity, electrical input and COP at the same temperature, speed and airflow.
A separate source for field studies and operating measurements, not a substitute for certified 17°F/47°F ratings.
Explore monitored heat-pump systems and their operating results on the original source website.
Group systems by equipment configuration, compressor type and nominal capacity before comparing their performance. Keep compact ducted, ductless single-zone and multizone systems in separate groups. Preserve every matched indoor/outdoor model and furnace identifier; do not treat a nominal outdoor unit as a complete matched system.
Confirm public display, downloads, derived statistics, attribution, refresh terms and removal obligations in writing.
Keep certified seasonal ratings separate from manufacturer extended points. Record temperatures, output level, airflow, static pressure, defrost and auxiliary heat.
Verify documents and dates, remove duplicate matches and disclose selection bias before summarizing.
Sample coverage and variation. Statistical summaries should disclose unique-system count, manufacturer count, missing-value count, date range, mean/median and variation for each compatible group. A model-count average is not a sales-weighted market average. Cold-climate eligibility and repeated indoor matches can bias a sample.
Load your own permission-cleared JSON file to inspect matched systems and compare reported conditions. This tool processes the file in this tab, does not upload it, and does not save it after you leave or reload. Importing is not verification or publication approval.
No local file loaded.
One exact matched system per record; nominal capacity in Btu/h; separate source entries for certified, extended and measured data; SEER2 with its source; separate heating points at each temperature and output level; capacity in Btu/h, total input in kW and reported COP. Unknown numeric values must be null, never zero. Use “unknown” for undocumented condition descriptions.
Complete the blank template with sourced equipment values and documented conditions before opening it for review. Review and permission fields record the information supplied in the file; independent verification is required before publication or reuse.
Equipment records intended for publication require a documented source and a consistent technical review:
Manufacturer-neutral summaries also require a comparable sample, disclosed coverage and measures of variation. The local workspace supports file review; publication and reuse permissions require a separate review.