Two different questions: does the robot always land in the same spot? And is that spot actually the one you asked for? A robot can nail the first and quietly fail the second.
Repeatability measures how consistently a robot returns to the same taught point, cycle after cycle — tight clustering of its actual stopping positions around each other, regardless of whether that cluster happens to sit where you originally intended. Accuracy measures how close the robot actually gets to the true, commanded coordinate in space — whether the center of that cluster matches where you really wanted it to go. A robot can have excellent repeatability while having mediocre accuracy: it returns to the exact same wrong spot every single time, off from the true target by a fixed amount caused by calibration error, imperfections in the kinematic model, or thermal drift. This is exactly why industrial robots are specified and sold primarily on repeatability, not accuracy — and why that gap causes real problems the moment a robot has to move somewhere it was never physically taught.